THE FUTURE IMPLEMENTATION OF FACE RECOGNITION IN INDONESIA IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Abstract
This normative legal research critically examines the prospective implementation of face recognition technology in Indonesia within the context of human rights. Utilizing normative legal analysis, the study seeks to unravel the perspective of human rights law regarding the integration of face recognition systems. The central question addressed is how human rights law perceives and evaluates the implications of adopting face recognition technology in Indonesia. The study reveals a potential contradiction between adopting face recognition and fundamental human rights principles. Primary concerns include the right to privacy and the right to personal identity. A nuanced exploration of existing legal frameworks exposes the need to assess the compatibility between face recognition practices thoroughly and established human rights norms. In conclusion, the implementation of face recognition in Indonesia holds the risk of violating human rights. The study advocates for consideration of human rights implications while integrating face recognition systems. A Precise legal framework that aligns with human rights principles is a must, safeguarding against potential abuses and ensuring an ethically sound deployment of face recognition technology in Indonesia.
References
Fadillah, Dani, Zalik Nuryana, and Sularso. “Public Opinion of the Facial Recognition Policy in China by Indonesian Student in Nanjing City.” OFS Preprints 24, no. 4 (2020): 1645–1652.
Kereta Api Indonesia. “Terapkan Face Recognition, Boarding Kini Cukup Pindai Wajah.” Kai. Id. Last modified 2022. Accessed December 14, 2023. https://www.kai.id/information/full_news/5452-terapkan-face-recognition-boarding-kini-cukup-pindai-wajah.
Kumaran, Ivano, Muhamad Ramdhani Firmansyah, Eva Fauziah, Yosep B. Hutahaean, Anang Suryana, Aryo De Wibowo Muhammad Sidik, Marina Artiyasa, Anggy Pradiftha Junfithrana, and Ilman Himawan Kusumah. “Pengenalan Wajah Menggunakan Pendekatan Berbasis Pengukuran Dan Metode Segmentasi Dalam Berbagai Posisi Dan Pencahayaan.” Jurnal Teknik Elektro 3, no. 1 (2022): 5–8.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada, 2010.
Maulana, Muhammad Dimas, Achmad Setiyo Prabowo, and Totok Warsito. “RANCANGAN PENDETEKSI WAJAH DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN KOMPUTASI MATLAB SEBAGAI ALAT BANTU KEAMANAN DI BANDAR UDARA.” Proceedings of The SEMINAR NASIONAL INOVASI TEKNOLOGI PENERBANGAN (SNITP) TAHUN 2020 (2020).
Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram university Press, 2020.
Nasution, Hilmi Ardani, and Marwandianto. “Hak Atas Kebebasan Berpendapat Dan Berekspresi Dalam Koridor Penerapan Pasal 310 Dan 311 KUHP.” Jurnal HAM Balitbangkumham 11, no. 1 (2020): 1–25.
Nugem, Duke. “Kemendagri Dan Polri Terapkan Teknologi Pengenalan Wajah Di KTT G20.” TB NEWS. Last modified 2022. Accessed December 14, 2023. https://tribratanews.babel.polri.go.id/2022/11/14/kemendagri-dan-polri-terapkan-teknologi-pengenalan-wajah-di-ktt-g20/.
Rachmaniar, Adelia, Aris Mustriadi, Hasyimi Pradana, and Aditya Prastian Supriyadi. “Regulating Facial Recognition Technology under the Indonesian Privacy and Data Protection Frameworks: The Pacing Problem?” 1st International Conference on Law Studies “Law Policy on Transnational Issues” Jakarta 1, no. 1 (2020): 23–44.
Warong, Kristian Megahputra, Caecilia J. J. Waha, and Cornelius Tangkere. “Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Kebebasan Berpendapat Oleh Organisasi Kemasyarakatan Di Media Sosial.” Lex Administratum VIII, no. 5 (2020): 44–53.