PRELIMINARY EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION AND PROCESS CHALLENGES IN APPLYING ACTIVATED CARBON, ZIF-67, AND AC/ZIF-67 COMPOSITE CATALYSTS FOR BIODIESEL PRODUCTION

Authors

  • Fauzan Irfandy Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Ni Luh Putu Mustika Praptiwi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Perwitasari Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Allen Haryanto Lukmana Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Agus Bambang Irawan Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Alya Kusuma Syifa Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Fransiska Carolina Putri Rondonuwu Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Annisa Purnama Dewi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Zaskia Ardia Meta Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Diah Ageng Laras Pambudi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  • Aqshal Farros Atthaya Ryananda Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36563/tjktca24

Keywords:

biodiesel, MOF, activated carbon, ZIF-67, heterogeneous catalyst

Abstract

Heterogeneous catalysts such as activated carbon, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), and their composites have been increasingly explored for biodiesel production due to their potential reusability and ease of separation. However, the practical performance of these catalysts in palm-oil transesterification often deviates significantly from theoretical expectations, especially in early-stage laboratory trials. This study provides a descriptive account of the initial experimental attempts using three catalysts—activated carbon (AC), ZIF-67, and an AC/ZIF-67 composite—under controlled transesterification conditions. Although no distinct biodiesel–glycerol phase separation was achieved, valuable insights were obtained regarding catalyst dispersion, reaction stability, and emulsion formation. Several factors contributed to the unsuccessful conversion, including incomplete catalyst activation, limited methanol–oil interaction, strong emulsion formation, and mass-transfer resistance. The observations are discussed in light of known mechanistic behavior of solid catalysts in biodiesel systems. A roadmap for improving catalyst activation, operating parameters, and experimental workflow is proposed to guide future work. This contribution highlights the importance of understanding early-stage experimental challenges, especially when novel porous catalysts are introduced to complex liquid–solid reaction systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A. Demirbas, Biodiesel: A Realistic Fuel Alternative for Diesel Engines, Springer (2008).

[2] M.K. Lam, K.T. Lee, A.R. Mohamed, Bioresource Technology 101, 5775 (2010).

[3] J. Clohessy, W. Kwapinski, Applied Sciences 10, 1030 (2020).

[4] X. Yang et al., Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 148, 9547 (2023).

[5] S. Frank et al., Journal of Materials Chemistry A 12, 781 (2024).

[6] X. Duan et al., Chemical Engineering Journal 435, 135210 (2022).

[7] P.K. Rout et al., Renewable Energy 168, 308 (2020).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-25

How to Cite

PRELIMINARY EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION AND PROCESS CHALLENGES IN APPLYING ACTIVATED CARBON, ZIF-67, AND AC/ZIF-67 COMPOSITE CATALYSTS FOR BIODIESEL PRODUCTION. (2025). INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR, 7, 887-891. https://doi.org/10.36563/tjktca24