LEGAL ANALYSIS OF HEALTHY PRODUCT CLAIMS MISLEADING IN THE BAKE N GRIND CASE IN BALI

Authors

  • Novia Dwi Fatmasari Universitas Tulungagung
  • Diah Ayu Lestari Universitas Tulungagung
  • Amalya Khoirul Fitri Universitas Tulungagung
  • Rizki Puji Lestari Universitas Tulungagung
  • M. Sri Astuti Agustina Universitas Tulungagung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36563/pz4hn162

Keywords:

Consumer Protection, Healthy Product Claims, Bake n Grind

Abstract

Misleading health product claims on food labels are a crucial issue in consumer protection in Indonesia. This study analyzes the Bake n Grind case as a concrete example, examining the national legal framework, enforcement effectiveness, and regulatory challenges. Using a juridical-normative approach with a literature review approach, this article examines the implementation of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Government Regulation Number 69 of 1999 concerning Food Labels and Advertisements, as well as other related regulations. The analysis reveals weak law enforcement, low consumer awareness, and the need for regulatory reform to prevent the practice of misleading claims. Policy recommendations focus on strengthening supervision, consumer education, and harmonizing digital regulations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anita Sinaga, N., & Sulisrudatin, N. (2015). PELAKSANAAN PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara – Fakultas Hukum Universitas Suryadarma, 5(2), 71–87.

Ayu, G., Dewi, I., Pradnya, D., Desak, P., & Kasih, P. D. (2017). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN TERKAIT IKLAN YANG MENYESATKAN DITINJAU BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DAN KODE ETIK PERIKLANAN INDONESIA.

Dewi, R. S. (2020). Legal Protection for Unlabeled and Licensed Home Industry Consumers of Food and Beverage. Point of View Research Management, 1(4), 94 - 99. Retrieved from https://journal.accountingpointofview.id/index.php/POVREMA/article/view/89

Dewi, R. S. (2021). Juridical Study of Responsible of Business Actors if Consumers Experience Losses. Point of View Research Management, 2(1), 47 - 52. Retrieved from https://www.journal.accountingpointofview.id/index.php/POVREMA/article/view/120

Handayani, H., Zahrah, H., Natarina, W. T., Susilawati, D., & Artikel, S. (2025). Analisis Pelanggaran Strategi Pemasaran dalam Praktik Repackaging dan Overclaim Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Skincare Lokal. 1(4b). https://doi.org/10.63822/twzme914

Prabowo, W., Puspandari, ,Rr Yunita, & Latifa, K. T. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Informasi Iklan Yang Menyesatkan. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, V(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.24090/VOLKSGEIST

Saefudin Junior, F. R., & Sukma Muliya, L. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Terkait Informasi yang Tidak Sesuai Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsls.v3i1.4950

Suci, A. M., Azarine, I. G., Maulana, K. A., & Hasna, N. T. (2024). Analisis Penerapan Etika Bisnis pada Kasus Strategi Pemasaran dengan Iklan Palsu dan Klaim Produk yang Berlebihan. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(14), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13280461

Sri Redjeki Hartono, makalah Aspek-aspek Hukum Perlindungan Konsumendalam buku Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Ibid, hal.34, dalam buku Celina Tri Siwi Kristiyanti, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008, hal.6.

Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan (BPOM). (2016). Laporan Kinerja Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Tahun 2016. Jakarta: BPOM. https://www.pom.go.id/new/view/more/publikasi/5678/Laporan-Kinerja-BPOM-2016.html

Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan (BPOM). (2016). Recall Alert: Produk Sari Roti Soft Cake. Jakarta: BPOM. https://www.pom.go.id/new/view/more/berita/9012/Recall-Alert-Produk-Sari-Roti-Soft-Cake.html

BPOM RI. (2018). Peraturan BPOM No. 31 Tahun 2018 tentang Label Pangan Olahan. https://standarpangan.pom.go.id

Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2013). Guidelines for Use of Nutrition and Health Claims (CAC/GL 23-1997). FAO/WHO

Peraturan

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 69 Tahun 1999 tentang Label dan Iklan Pangan

Berita

Associe. (2025). Kasus Bake N Grind dan isu perlindungan konsumen. Diakses pada 4 Desember 2025, pukul 17:58 WIB, dari https://associe.co.id/berita/kasus-bake-n-grind/

Radar Solo. (2025). Viral! Kronologi Bake n Grind Diduga Tipu Konsumen, Korban Bongkar Modus Klaim Roti Klaim Gluten Free Ternyata Repacking. Diakses pada 27 November 2025, pukul 17:58 WIB dari https://radarsolo.jawapos.com/nasional/846681592/viral-kronologi-bake-n-grind-diduga-tipu-konsumen-korban-bongkar-modus-klaim-roti-klaim-gluten-free-ternyata-repacking?page=4

Pangesti, R. (2025). Kasus Penipuan Roti Gluten Free, Polisi Segera Panggil Felicia Novenna Pemilik Bake n Grind. TV One News. Editor: Mumu Mujahidin. Diakses pada 26 November 2025, pukul 17:58 WIB, dari https://www.tvonenews.com/berita/nasional/392802-kasus-penipuan-roti-gluten-free-polisi-segera-panggil-felicia-novenna-pemilik-bake-n-grind. https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius

Downloads

Published

2025-12-25

How to Cite

LEGAL ANALYSIS OF HEALTHY PRODUCT CLAIMS MISLEADING IN THE BAKE N GRIND CASE IN BALI. (2025). INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR, 7, 1072-1083. https://doi.org/10.36563/pz4hn162

Similar Articles

1-10 of 69

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)