PEER REVIEW PROCESS

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

All papers submitted to the International Conference on Economics, Technology, Management, Accounting, Education, and Social Science (ICETEA) undergo a rigorous peer-review process to ensure the quality and integrity of the conference proceedings.

Review Process

  1. Initial Screening
    All submissions are first evaluated by the editorial team to ensure that they meet the conference scope, formatting requirements, and basic quality standards.
  2. Peer Review
    Each paper is reviewed by at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise. The review process follows a double-blind review system, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous.
  3. Review Criteria
    Papers are evaluated based on:
    • Originality and novelty
    • Relevance to conference themes
    • Methodological rigor
    • Clarity of presentation
    • Contribution to knowledge and practice
  4. Decision Making
    Based on reviewers’ comments, the editorial team will make one of the following decisions:
    • Accept
    • Accept with minor revisions
    • Revise and resubmit
    • Reject
  5. Revision Process
    Authors are required to revise their papers according to reviewers’ feedback within the specified time.
  6. Final Decision
    The final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief or Conference Chair based on reviewers’ recommendations.

Confidentiality

All submitted manuscripts are treated as confidential documents. Reviewers are required to maintain confidentiality and must not share or use unpublished materials for personal purposes.

Ethical Standards

The review process follows ethical guidelines to ensure fairness, objectivity, and transparency.

By implementing this peer-review process, ICETEA ensures the publication of high-quality and credible academic work.