EVALUATING CONTEXT AND ADAPTATION MECHANISMS OF THE SCHOOL MOBILIZATION PROGRAM IN REMOTE INDONESIA: A DEVELOPMENTAL EVALUATION APPROACH IN SUPIORI, PAPUA
Keywords:
program sekolah penggerak, 3T regions, context-mechanism-outcome, developmental evaluation, supiori papuaAbstract
Program Sekolah Penggerak (PSP) is a major systemic educational reform in Indonesia designed to transform schools into hubs of high-quality, student-centered learning. However, implementing such a standardized national policy in Frontier, Outermost, and Remote regions presents severe geographic, digital, and infrastructural challenges that traditional, top-down evaluation models fail to capture. This study evaluates how the local implementation context in a 3T region influences the execution of PSP, identifies the local adaptation mechanisms triggered by regional actors, and analyzes the resultant school-level outcomes. Utilizing Michael Quinn Patton Developmental Evaluation framework and the Context-Mechanism-Outcome (CMO) heuristic, this qualitative study investigates the experience of Junior High Schools in Supiori Regency, Papua. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key educational stakeholders, including the Head of the Education Office, school supervisors, and teachers. Data analysis was performed using thematic coding, validated by an NVivo-equivalent word frequency and node coding analysis to map coding densities. The findings reveal that, the implementation context was characterized by severe digital infrastructure gaps (e.g., intermittent internet and frequent power outages) and geographic isolation, local actors activated resilient adaptation mechanisms, including peer-led horizontal logistics networks and targeted regulatory incentives by the local education office, and the outcomes included significant contextual pedagogical innovations (e.g., coastal-based teaching media) and systemic school governance improvements (e.g., resolving teacher mismatching to achieve linear teaching distribution). By adapting standard program requirements to local socio-ecological realities, local agency transformed infrastructural limitations into opportunities for contextual learning and sustainable school improvement, providing a model for tailored educational policies in remote regions.
Downloads
References
Afifah, D. E., Kurniatun, T. C., & Hafidh, Z. (2023). Sekolah Penggerak Program : An Analysis of Implementation in Junior High Schools. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 6(3), 669–671.
Agirdag, O., & MUIJS, D. (2023). School leadership development and academic achievement: Effectiveness of the High Performing Schools programme. International Journal of Educational Research, 122, 102248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102248
Aldridge, J. M., & McLure, F. I. (2024). Preparing schools for educational change: Barriers and supports–A systematic literature review. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 23(3), 486–511.
Aldridge, J. M., Mclure, F. I., & Aldridge, J. M. (2024). Preparing Schools for Educational Change : Barriers and Supports – A Systematic Literature Review A Systematic Literature Review. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 23(3), 487–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2023.2171439
Dr. David C. Harding, Basilius Bengoteku, M. Y. S. (2014). Rural and Remote Area Education Strategic Planning Study for Tanah Papua , 2014 Analytical and Capacity Development Partnership ( ACDP ) Rural and Remote Area Education Strategic Planning Study for Tanah Papua , 2014. Education Sector Analytical and Capacity Development Partnership (ACDP).
Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a Culture of Change (Second). Jossey-Bass.
Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2021). Well-being in schools: Three forces that will uplift your students in a volatile world. ASCD.
Harris, A., Jones, M., & Hashim, N. (2021). System leaders and system leadership: Exploring the contemporary evidence base. School Leadership & Management, 41(4–5), 387–408.
Hasiki, A. (2026). KOMPARATIVNO ISTRAŽIVANJE PROMJENA U SUSTAVIMA OBVEZNOG ODGOJA I OBRAZOVANJA ESTONIJE, FINSKE I SINGAPURA, TE HRVATSKE, SLOVENIJE I SRBIJE.
Ismail, N., Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2021). System Leaders and System Leadership: Exploring the Contemporary Evidence Base. School Leadership and Management, 41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.1889492
John W. Creswell, C. N. P. C. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches J (4th ed.). SAGE Publication.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 Tahun 2020 tentang Rencana Strategis Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan tahun 2020-2024. Jdih.Kemendikbud.Go.Id, 1–242.
Kmurawak, R. M. B., Warikar, E. O., Kmurawak, R. L. S., & Yensenem, B. B. (2025). Transformasi Digital Papua: Teori dan Implementasi. Kaizen Media Publishing. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ai-FEQAAQBAJ
Koh, G. A., Askell-williams, H., & Barr, S. (2023). Sustaining school improvement initiatives : advice from educational leaders educational leaders. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2190130
Koh, G. A., Askell-williams, H., Barr, S., & Askell-williams, H. (2023). Sustaining school improvement initiatives : advice from educational leaders Sustaining school improvement initiatives : advice from educational leaders. SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS AND SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT, 34(3), 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2190130
Nielsen, S. B., Lemire, S., & Tangsig, S. (2022). Unpacking context in realist evaluations: Findings from a comprehensive review. Evaluation, 28(1), 91–112.
Patton, M. Q. (2023). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. books.google.com. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=HXitEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT8&dq=evaluation+of+the+quality+improvement+program+in+efforts+to+achieve+a+leading+study+program+at+higher+education+integration+of+the+realist+model+and+outcome+mapping+journal&ots=SJ3I
Patton Michael, Q. (2011). Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. New York: Guilford Press.
Patton, Q., Guijt, I., & Visser, I. (2012). Developmental Evaluation : Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use Report from an Expert Seminar. Wageningen UR Centre for Development Innovation, 2.
Rahayu, R., Rosita, R., Rahayuningsih, Y. S., Hernawan, A. H., & Prihantini, P. (2022). Jurnal basicedu. 6(4), 6313–6319.
Rahayu, R., Rosita, R., Sri Rahayuningsih, Y., Hernawan, A., & Prihantini, P. (2022). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar di Sekolah Penggerak. Jurnal Basicedu, 6, 6313–6319. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3237
Renmans, D., & Pleguezuelo, V. C. (2023). Methods in realist evaluation: A mapping review. Evaluation and Program Planning, 97, 102209.
Reynolds, D., & Neeleman, A. (2021). School improvement capacity–A review and a reconceptualization from the perspectives of educational effectiveness and educational policy. Concept and Design Developments in School Improvement Research: Longitudinal, Multilevel and Mixed Methods and Their Relevance for Educational Accountability, 27–40.
Rohmani, Z., Budiana, A. A., & Subhani, A. (2025). Pendidikan di Daerah 3T (Terdepan, Terluar, Tertinggal): Kondisi dan Harapan. Eduversity: Journal of Future Interdisciplinary Education, 1(1), 15–20.
Samhaji, S., & Anggara, F. D. (2025). Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Pemerataan Akses Pendidikan pada Daerah Tertinggal Indonesia. Journal of Governance and Policy Innovation, 5(2), 99–112.
SMP RAPOR-KAB-SUPIORI-2024 (1). (n.d.).
Wiryatmo, R., Iriani, A., & Waruwu, M. (2023). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Penguatan SDM Program Sekolah Penggerak di Sekolah Menengah Pertama dengan Model CIPPO. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 10, 22–34. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2023.v10.i1.p22-34
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






