WHAT DRIVES MERGER AND ACQUISITION SUCCESS? A MULTILEVEL SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
Keywords:
Mergers and Acquisitions, M&A Success, Institutional Environment, Strategic FitAbstract
Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are widely employed as strategic instruments to achieve growth, restructuring, and competitive advantage. Nevertheless, the persistent gap between expected synergies and realized post-merger performance suggests that M&A success is shaped by a complex and interdependent configuration of determinants rather than by financial considerations alone. This study systematically synthesizes the key determinants and causal mechanisms of M&A success through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of 60 peer-reviewed international journal articles published between 2020 and 2025. The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and analyzed using thematic synthesis. The findings indicate that the determinants of M&A success can be organized into four interrelated clusters: (1) institutional environment, (2) corporate governance and managerial characteristics, (3) strategic fit and resource capabilities, and (4) post-merger integration and behavioral factors. These clusters operate through core mechanisms, including the quality of strategic decision-making, synergy realization and organizational learning, institutional legitimacy and uncertainty reduction, and the effectiveness of social and cultural integration. From a theoretical perspective, this study integrates Agency Theory, Upper Echelons Theory, the Resource-Based View, Dynamic Capabilities, Institutional Theory, and behavioral perspectives into a unified multilevel framework that conceptualizes M&A success as the outcome of interactions across macro-level institutional conditions, meso-level governance and strategic configurations, and micro-level integration processes and human dynamics. By adopting this multilevel perspective, the study advances the M&A literature beyond fragmented, single-level explanations and clarifies how structural contexts, organizational capabilities, and social processes jointly shape value creation. Practically, the findings suggest that sustainable M&A success depends not only on strategic and financial alignment but also on robust governance structures, adaptive organizational capabilities, and effective management of cultural and behavioral integration. The proposed conceptual framework offers a comprehensive foundation for scholars and practitioners to better understand and manage M&A as an integrated process of economic, organizational, and socio-cultural transformation.
Downloads
References
Acero, I., & Alcalde, N. (2021). Institutional context as a moderator of the relationship between board structure and acquirer returns. Research in International Business and Finance, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIBAF.2021.101420
Ahsan, F. M., Popli, M., & Kumar, V. (2024). Formal institutions and cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A systematic literature review and research agenda. International Business Review, 33(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IBUSREV.2024.102306
Angwin, D. N., Urs, U., Appadu, N., Thanos, I. C., Vourloumis, S., & Kastanakis, M. N. (2022). Does merger & acquisition (M&A) strategy matter? A contingency perspective. European Management Journal, 40(6), 847–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EMJ.2022.09.004
Brahma, S., Zhang, J., Boateng, A., & Nwafor, C. (2023). Political connection and M&A performance: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 85, 372–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IREF.2023.01.026
Cai, C., He, L., & Wen, J. (2025). Stability of executive teams, corporate financialization, and cross-border mergers and acquisitions. International Review of Economics & Finance, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IREF.2025.104124
Degbey, W. Y., & Pelto, E. (2021). Customer knowledge sharing in cross-border mergers and acquisitions: The role of customer motivation and promise management. Journal of International Management, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INTMAN.2021.100858
Huang, G., & Shen, L. (2024). When does digital merger and acquisition create shareholder value? An empirical investigation in the Chinese context. Heliyon, 10(14). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2024.E34237
Huang, J., & Xie, T. (2023). Technology centrality, bilateral knowledge spillovers and mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCORPFIN.2023.102366
Ince, B. (2024). How do regulatory costs affect mergers and acquisitions decisions and outcomes? Journal of Banking & Finance, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBANKFIN.2024.107156
Kvĕtoň, V., Bĕlohradský, A., & Blažek, J. (2020). The variegated role of proximities in acquisitions by domestic and international companies in different phases of economic cycles. Papers in Regional Science, 99(3), 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/PIRS.12506
Lin, T. C., & Pursiainen, V. (2023). Social trust distance in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBANKFIN.2023.106759
Luan, Z., Huang, S., & Wen, J. (2025). Employee emotions, employee resilience, and cross-border mergers and acquisitions performance. International Review of Economics & Finance, 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IREF.2025.104631
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Ramadhana, M. O., Adioetomo, S. M., Irbansyah, B., & Hartijasti, Y. (2022). Building Acquisition Management Capability to Improve Firm Performance in Acquisitions: International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJABIM.289650
Rao, S., Koirala, S., Aldhawyan, S., & Corbet, S. (2023). Geopolitical risk and M&A: The role of national governance institutions. Economics Letters, 225. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONLET.2023.111062
Sha, Y., Kang, C., & Wang, Z. (2020). Economic policy uncertainty and mergers and acquisitions: Evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 89, 590–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONMOD.2020.03.029
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2019.07.039
Song, Y., & Wang, Q. (2025). The double-edged sword of political power in Chinese merger and acquisitions: CEOs, boards, and market reactions. International Review of Economics & Finance, 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IREF.2025.104752
Teerikangas, S., & Colman, H. L. (2020). Theorizing in the qualitative study of mergers & acquisitions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCAMAN.2019.101090
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375