POLITICAL PARTIES BETWEEN ELECTORAL INTERESTS AND PUBLIC REPRESENTATION: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF LOCAL DEMOCRACY IN INDONESIA
Keywords:
political parties, electoral interests, public representation, regional elections, local democracyAbstract
Political parties are a key pillar of representative democracy, but in local democratic practices in Indonesia, their role tends to be diminished by the dominance of electoral interests. This article aims to critically analyze how the electoral orientation of political parties influences the quality of public representation, transactional political practices, and elite power relations in the context of regional head elections (Pilkada). This research uses a qualitative approach using literature review and document analysis, including Pilkada regulations and previous empirical studies. The analytical framework is based on the theories of procedural and substantive democracy (Dahl), the institutionalization of political parties (Panebianco), and the theory of political oligarchy (Winters). The results show that high political costs encourage the practice of political dowries, candidate dependence on sponsors, and the strengthening of transactional politics, ultimately weakening the accountability of regional heads after their election. Furthermore, the dominance of local elites and the lack of political competition indicate that political parties function more as arenas for elite negotiation than as institutions of public representation. These findings highlight the gap between procedural and substantive democracy in local democracy. This article concludes that strengthening local democracy requires institutional reform of political parties to reorient them toward representing the public interest.
Downloads
References
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (Eds.). (2016). Electoral dynamics in Indonesia: Money politics, patronage and clientelism at the grassroots. NUS Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.
Hadiz, V. R. (2010). Localising power in post-authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia perspective. Stanford University Press.
Hannan, A. (2023). Fenomena calon tunggal dalam pilkada dan implikasinya terhadap demokrasi lokal. Jurnal Politik Walisongo, 7(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.21580/jpw.2023.7.2.17499
Kristiyanto, E. N., Nugroho, H., & Prasetyo, A. (2023). Party institutionalization and electoral competition in Indonesia’s democracy. Heliyon, 9(6), e16543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16543
Mainwaring, S. (2018). Party system institutionalization revisited: Theory and evidence. Studies in Comparative International Development, 53(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-017-9271-9
Mietzner, M. (2015). Reinventing Asian populism: Jokowi’s rise, democracy, and political contestation in Indonesia. East-West Center.
Mietzner, M. (2020). Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: Electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization, 27(6), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1704266
Naimah Putri, R. (2024). Partai politik dan krisis representasi dalam demokrasi Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Manajemen Publik, 5(1), 23–38.
Panebianco, A. (1988). Political parties: Organization and power. Cambridge University Press.
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
Republik Indonesia. (2015). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2015 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Wali Kota. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2015 Nomor 57.
Republik Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Wali Kota. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 130.
Rusnaedy, Z. (2021). Politik transaksional dalam pemilihan kepala daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosiologi Politik, 6(1), 89–104.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1942). Party government. Farrar & Rinehart.
Simanjutak, R. (2024). Kaderisasi partai politik dan tantangan demokrasi lokal di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Pemerintahan, 10(1), 55–71.
Ufen, A. (2008). From aliran to dealignment: Political parties in post-Suharto Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 16(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000008784108158
Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978557
Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan Ketiga atas Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 tentang Pencalonan Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur, Bupati dan Wakil Bupati, serta Wali Kota dan Wakil Wali Kota.
Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia. (2024). Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 8 Tahun 2024 tentang Pencalonan Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur, Bupati dan Wakil Bupati, serta Wali Kota dan Wakil Wali Kota.
Download Journal Template 
