LEARNING AGILITY AND GEO-OCCUPATION WELL-BEING IN GIG WORKERS: SPATIAL ADAPTATION IN THE PLATFORM ECONOMY

Authors

  • Arfi Wanda Safitri Universitas Islam Indonesia Author
  • Arief Fahmie Universitas Islam Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Learning agility, platform economy, geo-occupational well-being system, gig workers, occupational well-being

Abstract

The development of the platform economy has significantly changed the work landscape, particularly for location-based gig workers who face continuous and uncertain spatial changes. This study aims to explore the conceptual relationship between learning agility and geo-occupational well-being in the context of gig workers in organizational development and change. Using a brief literature review method, this study examines previous studies on gig workers, algorithm management, occupational well-being, and learning agility. The results of the review indicate that platform-based organizational change has a strong spatial dimension and directly impacts the affective, cognitive, social, and psychosomatic well-being of gig workers. Learning agility emerges as a crucial adaptive capability that enables workers to learn from cross-location experiences, develop flexible spatial work strategies, and maintain well-being amidst geographic uncertainty. It is found that the integration of learning agility and GOWS provides a relevant framework for understanding individual adaptation in the platform economy, while offering implications for organizational development, platform policy design, and future research agendas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acs, Z. J., Song, A. K., Szerb, L., Audretsch, D. B., & Komlósi, É. (2021). The evolution of the global digital platform economy: 1971–2021. Small Business Economics, 57(4), 1629–1659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00561-x

Apouey, B., Roulet, A., Solal, I., & Stabile, M. (2020). Gig workers during the covid-19 crisis in france: financial precarity and mental well-being. Journal of Urban Health, 97(6), 776–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-020-00480-4

Asrori, S., Isma’il, M., & Gamalinda, E. F. (2025). The flexibility illusion: Algorithmic control and precarity in Indonesia’s gig economy. Simulacra, 8(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.21107/sml.v8i2.30214

Baltimore, D., Charo, R. A., Kevles, D. J., & Benjamin, R. (2016). Summit on human gene editing. Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3), 62–69.

Bergefurt, L., Weijs-Perrée, M., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., & Arentze, T. (2022). The physical office workplace as a resource for mental health – A systematic scoping review. Building and Environment, 207, 108505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108505

Bhattacharyya, S. (2025). Between livelihood and learning: a study of changing academic trends in the age of the gig economy. International Journal of Novel Research Dan Development, 10(10), 101–109.

Blázquez, M., Herrarte, A., & Moro-Egido, A. I. (2024). Well-being effects of the digital platform economy: The case of temporary and self-employment. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 30(6), 1618–1651. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2024.21858

Brignardello-Petersen, R., Santesso, N., & Guyatt, G. H. (2025). Systematic reviews of the literature: An introduction to current methods. American Journal of Epidemiology, 194(2), 536–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae232

Choi, J.-H., & Moon, J. (2017). Impacts of human and spatial factors on user satisfaction in office environments. Building and Environment, 114, 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.003

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches 5th ed. SAGE Publication. https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf

DeRue, D. S., Ashford, S. J., & Myers, C. G. (2012). Learning agility: In search of conceptual clarity and theoretical grounding. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01444.x

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. HUMANIKA, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075

Griesbach, K. (2025). Space and inequality in precarious work: thinking with and beyond platforms. Sociology Compass, 19(3), e70026. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.70026

Handayani, S. A. D. P., Supartha, I. W. G., Rahyuda, A. G., & Surya, I. B. K. (2025). Elevansi learning agility karyawan di dunia kerja: tinjauan literatur. Journal of Information System, Applied, Management, Accounting and Research, 9(1), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.52362/jisamar.v9i1.1718.

Horn, J. E., Taris, T. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Schreurs, P. J. G. (2004). The structure of occupational well‐being: A study among Dutch teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(3), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1348/0963179041752718

Jeong, H. I., & Sung, S. (n.d.). The effect of learning agility on organizational citizenship behavior: Focused on the mediating effects of work engagement. J. Lifelong Educ. Hum. Resour. Dev, 14, 139–173. https://doi.org/10.35637/klehrd.2018.14.%25201.006

Kellogg, D. L. (2006). In vivo mechanisms of cutaneous vasodilation and vasoconstriction in humans during thermoregulatory challenges. Journal of Applied Physiology, 100(5), 1709–1718. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01071.2005

Lang, J. J., Yang, L. F., Cheng, C., Cheng, X. Y., & Chen, F. Y. (2023). Are algorithmically controlled gig workers deeply burned out? An empirical study on employee work engagement. BMC Psychology, 11(1), 354. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01402-0

Liu, R., & Yin, H. (2024). How algorithmic management influences gig workers’ job crafting. Behavioral Sciences, 14(10), 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100952

Miley, M. (2020). How does learning agility affect a sales workforce in an IT multinational? Dublin City University.

Moghavvemi, S., Teng, L. S., & Mahmoud, H. (2023). Gig workers versus knowledge workers. In S. Moghavvemi, L. S. Teng, & H. Mahmoud, Reshaping the Future: The Phenomenon of Gig Workers and Knowledge-Economy (pp. 33–44). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-350-320231003

Möhlmann, M., Zalmanson, L., Henfridsson, O., & Gregory, R. W. (2021). Algorithmic management of work on online labor platforms: When matching meets control. MIS Quarterly, 45(4), 1999–2022. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/15333

Nareswari, F., & Astuti, R. J. (2025). A scientometric review of the relationship between learning agility and work engagement in modern management context. Asian Management and Business Review, 5(1), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.20885/AMBR.vol5.iss1.art13

Nguyen-Phuoc, D., Nguyen, L. N. T., Su, D. N., Nguyen, M. H., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023). Deadly meals: The influence of personal and job factors on burnout and risky riding behaviours of food delivery motorcyclists. Safety Science, 159, 106007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.106007

Nilsen, M., & Kongsvik, T. (2023). Health, safety, and well-being in platform-mediated work – a job demands and resources perspective. Safety Science, 163, 106130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106130

Oranburg, S., & Palagashvili, L. (2018). The gig economy, smart contracts, and disruption of traditional work arrangements. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3270867

Rani, U., & Furrer, M. (2019). On-demand digital economy: can experience ensure work and income security for microtask workers? Jahrbücher Für Nationalökonomie Und Statistik, 239(3), 565–597. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2018-0019

Ray, A. (2024). Coping with crisis and precarity in the gig economy: ‘Digitally organised informality’, migration and socio-spatial networks among platform drivers in India. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 56(4), 1227–1244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X231220296

Simatupang, B. L. Y. (2025). Work flexibility, income uncertainty, and gig workers’ welfare in dki jakarta. SMEs and Sustainability Journal, 1(1), 1–22.

Tan, J.-E., & Gong, R. (2014). The plight of platform workers under algorithmic management in southeast asia. Carnige Endowment for International Peace.

Tassinari, A., & Maccarrone, V. (2020). Riders on the storm: Workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 34(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019862954

Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13

Theonia, H., & Prabhughate, A. (2024). Driving an Ojol: Insights from drivers, key issues, and pathways for reform to address the challenges of Indonesia’s booming ride-hailing market. WageIndicator.

Useche, S. A., Robayo, S., & Orozco-Fontalvo, M. (2024). The hidden cost of your ‘too fast food’: Stress-related factors and fatigue predict food delivery riders’ occupational crashes. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 30(3), 825–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2356997

Van Doorn, N., Ferrari, F., & Graham, M. (2023). Migration and migrant labour in the gig economy: an intervention. Work, Employment and Society, 37(4), 1099–1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221096581

Wan, Z., Zhang, L., Wang, L., & Zhang, F. (2024). Navigating autonomy: Unraveling the dual influence of job autonomy on workplace well-being in the gig economy. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1369495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369495

Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616

Wu, P. F., Zheng, R., Zhao, Y., & Li, Y. (2022). Happy riders are all alike? Ambivalent subjective experience and mental well‐being of food‐delivery platform workers in China. New Technology, Work and Employment, 37(3), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12243

Zhang, A., Boltz, A., Wang, C. W., & Lee, M. K. (2022). Algorithmic management reimagined for workers and by workers: centering worker well-being in gig work. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501866

Downloads

Published

2026-02-17

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Articles

How to Cite

LEARNING AGILITY AND GEO-OCCUPATION WELL-BEING IN GIG WORKERS: SPATIAL ADAPTATION IN THE PLATFORM ECONOMY. (2026). Proceeding of SINERGY, 1(1), 934-943. https://conference.unita.ac.id/index.php/proceeding-of-sinergy/article/view/727

Similar Articles

61-70 of 76

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)