IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RAMSAR CONVENTION ON THE CONVERSION OF MANGROVE LAND IN COASTAL AREAS OF SOUTH SULAWESI
Keywords:
Ramsar Convention Principle, Mangrove Conversion, South Sulawesi CoastAbstract
The purpose of the international Ramsar Convention is to prevent, control, and stop the destruction of mangrove areas in various coastal areas, both internationally, nationally, and locally. The type of research used is normative, namely examining the normative elements in the Ramsar Convention regarding various cases of conversion of mangrove land in the South Sulawesi Coast. The approach used is a legal approach. Various cases of conversion of mangrove land are mostly dominated by cases of conversion into fishponds by local communities themselves who have long lived in the mangrove areas of the South Sulawesi Coast, such as Maros, Pangkep, Takalar, Jeneponto, Pinrang, and Luwu. Based on the findings and data that have been presented, the application of the most appropriate management concept to control the conversion of mangrove land in the South Sulawesi coastal area is to consistently implement the principles mandated in the Ramsar Convention. The first principle of the Ramsar Convention is the concept of wise use. The second principle of the Ramsar Convention is the obligation to maintain the ecological character of wetlands. The third principle is the concept of conservation combined with sustainable use. The fourth principle is an integrated approach to policy and governance. The fifth principle is community and stakeholder involvement. As an ideal way to resolve the conversion of mangrove land in the coastal areas of South Sulawesi, the five principles of the Ramsar Convention must be implemented.
Downloads
References
A. Posner Richard, (2014). Economic Analysis of Law, 9th ed., New York: Wolters Kluwer.
Adolf Huala, (2015). Hukum Arbitrase Komersial Internasional, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Agil Putri Ramadhani dkk, (2025). Arbitrase dan Litigasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik Vol. 3 No. 1.
Agustina, R. E. (2024). Efektifitas Arbitrase sebagai Penyelesaian Perselisihan. Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary, 2(1).
Baharuddin, (2024). Arbitrase dan Tantangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Indonesia, Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group,
Baharuddin, M. Y. A. (2024). Peran Hukum Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian SengketBisnis Nasional: Hukum a Arbitrase. Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan, 5(2).
Cooter Robert & Thomas Ulen, (2012). Law and Economics, 6th ed., Boston: Pearson Education,
Damian Eddy, (2014). Hukum Hak Cipta, Bandung: Alumni.
David A. Aaker, (1991). Managing Brand Equity, New York: Free Press,.
Djatmiko & Wijaya, (2022). Problematika Eksekusi Putusan Arbitrase di Indonesia, Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
Frank I. Schechter, (1927).“The Rational Basis of Trademark Protection,” Harvard Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 6,
Gary B. Born, (2014). International Commercial Arbitration, 2nd ed., Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law Internasional.
Gautama Sudargo, (2004). Arbitrase Dagang Internasional, Alumni, Bandung.
Goldstein Paul, (2013). International Intellectual Property Law: Cases and Materials, 3rd ed., New York: Foundation Press,
Gunawan Widjaja, (2008). Arbitrase Internasional dan Nasional, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Harahap Yahya, (2017) Hukum Acara Perdata, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Ian R. Macneil, (1980). The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ibrahim Johnny, (2011). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Malang: Bayumedia Publishing,
Jened Rahmi, (2017). Hukum Merek (Trademark Law) dalam Era Global dan Integrasi Ekonomi, Jakarta: Kencana.
Juwana Hikmahanto, (2004). “Kendala Pengakuan dan Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Asing di Indonesia,” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 34 No. 3.
Keith E. Maskus, (2000). Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy, Washington D.C.: Institute for International Economics,
Kementerian Hukum Republik Indonesia Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual, K.I Komunal, https://dgip.go.id/index.php/artikel/detail-artikel-berita/pelanggaran-kekayaan-intelektual-capai-296-kasus-dalam-tujuh-tahun-djki-perkuat-langkah-penegakan-hukum?kategori=ki-komunal&utm_source=chatgpt.com diakses pada tanggal 2 Januari 2026.
Konvensi New York 1958 tentang Pengakuan dan Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Asing.
Laurence Boulle,( 2005), Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice, London: LexisNexis Butterworths,
M. Friedman Lawrence, (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective, New York: Russell Sage Foundation,
M. Hussyen Umar, (2017), Undang-Undang Arbitrase Indonesia Perlu Perubahan, Indonesia Arbitration Quarterly Newsletter Vol. 9 No. 3.
Mark A. Lemley & Carl Shapiro,( 2007). “Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking,” Texas Law Review, Vol. 85.
Mark A. Lemley, (2002.). “Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations,” California Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 6,
Mark A. Lemley, (2013 ). “Confidentiality and Trade Secrets in Intellectual Property Disputes,” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 22 No. 1.
Marzuki. (2020). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis: Alternatif dan Litigasi. Edisi ke-2. Prenada Media.
Mertokusumo Sudikno, (2009). Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar, Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Muhammad dzaqit taqwa,(2024) Lulusan hukum berperan penting dalam penyelesaian sengketa bisnis atau ‘arbitrase’, tapi kampus belum siapkan mereka dengan baik, berita opini fakultas hukum universitas gadjah madah.
N. Krisnawenda, (2009). 32 Tahun Arbitrase BANI, Buletin Triwulan Arbirase Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2009, Published by: BANI Arbitration Center, Jakarta.
Nurlani, Meirina. (2022). “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Sengketa Bisnis Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, (2017). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana.
Purnama, (2021). Litigasi Bisnis: Proses, Biaya, dan Implikasinya, Bandung: Refika Aditama,
Putra, A., & Wijaya, S. (2022). Konflik Kontrak dan Penyelesaiannya dalam Ekosistem Bisnis Digital. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis.
R. Subekti, (2001). Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Sari, Arbitrase sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012.
Siahaan, Hukum Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.
Soekanto Soerjono & Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018, hlm. 13–14.
Soekanto Soerjono, (2008). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sudargo Gautama, (1992). Arbitrase Internasional dan Peraturan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni.
Sudiarto dan Zaeni Asyhadie, (2004). Mengenal Arbitrase, Suatu Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Sudiro, A., & Harahap, T. (2021). Dampak Sengketa Komersial terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Publik. Jurnal Manajemen dan Akuntansi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.
Usman Rachmadi, (2003). Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti,
Usman Rachmadi, (2012). Hukum Arbitrase Nasional, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Usman Rachmadi, (2013). Hukum Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual: Perlindungan dan Dimensi Hukumnya di Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni,.
Wahid, (2020). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Praktik Bisnis, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
WIPO,(2017). World Intellectual Property Report: Intangible Capital in the Global Economy, Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization,
Download Journal Template 
