BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY AS A DIGITAL ECONOMIC ENABLER: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DECENTRALIZED ASSET AND CRYPTOCURRENCY PROTOCOLS (BITCOIN vs. ETHEREUM)

Authors

  • Eka Maulana Brawijaya University Author
  • Cries Avian Brawijaya University Author
  • Dony Darmawan Putra Institute of Communication Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University Author

Keywords:

blockchain technology, Decentralized Finance, digital economic, cryptocurrency, bitcoin

Abstract

The digital economy demands a new generation of infrastructure capable of facilitating trust, finality, and novel forms of value exchange without centralized intermediaries. This paper posits that blockchain technology serves as a foundational enabler for this digital economic paradigm, but its specific economic impact is profoundly shaped by the core design choices embedded within its protocols. To investigate this thesis, we conduct a comparative case study analysis of the two dominant and archetypal blockchains: Bitcoin and Ethereum. Employing an analytical framework that evaluates protocols across dimensions of primary economic function, consensus and security, programmability, governance, and tokenomics, this study contrasts Bitcoin's design as a decentralized, censorship-resistant store-of-value as a digital gold with Ethereum's design as a globally accessible, programmable platform for decentralized assets and applications of world computer. Our findings reveal a fundamental trade-off: Bitcoin's focus on security, simplicity, and predictable monetary policy creates a robust but functionally narrow economic enabler, while Ethereum's flexibility and composability foster a vast and innovative on-chain economy at the cost of greater complexity and evolving security challenges. The comparison demonstrates that there is no singular blockchain economic model; rather, protocol design dictates the scope, capabilities, and risks of the enabled digital economy. The analysis concludes by discussing the implications of this dichotomy for the future of digital assets, including the emergence of alternative layer-1 and modular blockchains, and highlighting key challenges in scalability, interoperability, and regulation that will shape the next phase of blockchain-enabled economic activity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2017). Rethinking case study research: A comparative approach. Routledge.

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Buterin, V. (2013). Ethereum whitepaper: A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. Ethereum Foundation. https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/

Catalini, C., & Gans, J. S. (2016). Some simple economics of the blockchain (Working Paper No. 22952). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22952

Celestia. (2023). Celestia: A modular blockchain network. Celestia Foundation. https://docs.celestia.org/

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Penguin.

World Economic Forum. (2020). The global governance of digital currencies: An agenda for research and action [White paper]. https://www.weforum.org/

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage publications.

Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2017). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. In 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress) (pp. 557–564). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigDataCongress.2017.85

Downloads

Published

2026-02-17

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Articles

How to Cite

BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY AS A DIGITAL ECONOMIC ENABLER: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DECENTRALIZED ASSET AND CRYPTOCURRENCY PROTOCOLS (BITCOIN vs. ETHEREUM). (2026). Proceeding of SINERGY, 1(1), 962-975. https://conference.unita.ac.id/index.php/proceeding-of-sinergy/article/view/730

Similar Articles

1-10 of 76

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.