USING AI TOOLS FOR LEGAL PURPOSES AND DOCUMENT WRITING: PERCEPTIONS AND AWARENESS AMONG UNDERGRADUATE BUSINESS STUDENTS AT A THAI PUBLIC UNIVERSITY

Authors

  • Alan Robert White Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep Author

Keywords:

Accounting Information Systems, Internal Control, System Evaluation, Accounting, Information Technology

Abstract

This research examines the awareness of undergraduate business students regarding the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in writing legal business documents. As AI tools become increasingly prevalent in professional and academic environments, understanding student knowledge, usage patterns, and perceptions is essential for curriculum development and educational practice. This study employed a quantitative approach using a structured questionnaire administered to 45 undergraduate business students enrolled in an international program at a Thai public university. The survey assessed awareness levels, perceptions of AI capabilities and limitations, actual usage patterns, and educational preferences regarding AI-assisted legal writing. Results indicate that students demonstrate moderate to high awareness of AI tools in legal business writing (M=2.82-3.87), with strongest understanding of document types and tool differentiation. Participants showed critical awareness of AI limitations, strongly agreeing that AI reduces but does not eliminate the need for human legal expertise (M=4.16). However, actual usage patterns revealed a significant gap between awareness and application, with limited direct use of AI for drafting legal documents (M=2.33-2.80) but more frequent use for grammar and structural improvement (M=3.64). Students expressed strong support for integrating AI instruction into university curricula (M=3.33) and emphasized the need for training on ethical and responsible use (M=3.67). The findings reveal considerable variation in student knowledge levels and minimal pedagogical guidance from instructors. This study contributes to business education literature by addressing a significant gap in research on student engagement with AI tools for legal writing. The results support recommendations for structured curriculum development incorporating technical competencies, critical evaluation skills, and ethical frameworks. Educational institutions should develop explicit policies and instructional modules to prepare students for professional contexts where AI-assisted legal writing is increasingly common while maintaining academic integrity and professional standards.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alarie, B., Niblett, A., & Yoon, A. H. (2018). How artificial intelligence will affect the practice of law. University of Toronto Law Journal, 68(supplement 1), 106–124. Cyphert, A. B. (2023). Generative AI, plagiarism, and copyright infringement in legal documents. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 25, 49.

Davenport, M. J. (2025). Enhancing legal document analysis with large language models: A structured approach to accuracy, context preservation, and risk mitigation. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 15(2), 232–280.

Gouri, H., Jindal, P., Gouri, R., & Gouri, V. (2025). AI-generated legal documents: Challenges and opportunities for corporate law firms. Exploration of AI in Contemporary Legal Systems, 73–84.

Harasta, J., Novotná, T., & Savelka, J. (2024). It cannot be right if it was written by AI: On lawyers’ preferences of documents perceived as authored by an LLM vs a human. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1–38.

Mika, K. (2022). Friend or foe? Lexis artificial intelligence (AI) in legal writing. Proceedings: Online Journal of Legal Writing Presentations, 3(1), 24.

Pham, T. T. D., & Luong, M. H. (2025). Students’ challenges in employing AI tools in legal writing. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 5(2), 75–86.

Regalia, J. (2024). From briefs to bytes: How generative AI is transforming legal writing and practice. Tulsa Law Review, 59, 193.

Smith, M. L. (2023). Language models, plagiarism, and legal writing. University of New Hampshire Law Review, 22, 361.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-21

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Articles

How to Cite

USING AI TOOLS FOR LEGAL PURPOSES AND DOCUMENT WRITING: PERCEPTIONS AND AWARENESS AMONG UNDERGRADUATE BUSINESS STUDENTS AT A THAI PUBLIC UNIVERSITY. (2026). Proceeding of SINERGY, 1(1), 1315-1324. https://conference.unita.ac.id/index.php/proceeding-of-sinergy/article/view/764

Similar Articles

1-10 of 96

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.