ANALYSIS OF E-GOVERNMENT FACILITIES IN DELIVERING PUBLIC SERVICES IN TAPIN REGENCY
Keywords:
E-Goverment, public policy, innovation, public servicesAbstract
E-Government in Tapin Regency serves to deliver public services to both internal and external stakeholders. This study analyzes the e-government facilities that support public service delivery in Tapin Regency. The research begins with a review of public service and e-government concepts, followed by an examination of e-government facilities using the E-Government Maturity Level framework developed by Wirtz and Piehler. The analysis focuses on the e-government website, online public services, and applications in Tapin Regency. Data collection methods include observation, stakeholder interviews, and literature review. The findings indicate that several public services fulfill four e-government business models and correspond to the fourth stage of e-government development. Therefore, certain public services in Tapin Regency have attained the fourth level of e-government maturity.
Downloads
References
Dwiyanto, D. (2022). Dasar hukum bagi e-government di Indonesia: Studi pemetaan hukum pada pemerintah daerah. Court Review: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.69957/cr.v2i5.520
Fadilurrahman, M., Ramadhani, R., Kurniawan, T., Misnasanti, & Shaddiq, S. (2021). Systematic literature review of disruption era in Indonesia: The resistance of Industrial Revolution 4.0. Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC). https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.2152
Fajar, M. N. D., & Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualisme penelitian hukum: Normatif & empiris. Pustaka Pelajar.
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
Morgeson, F. V., VanAmburg, D., & Mithas, S. (2011). Misplaced trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government–citizen trust relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq006
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Government at a glance 2015. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2015-en
Republic of Indonesia. (2009). Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 25 of 2009 on Public Services. State Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia.
Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00594.x
United Nations. (2022). United Nations e-government survey 2022: The future of digital government. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2022
Wirtz, B. W. (2022). Digital government: Strategy, government models and technology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13086-1
Zhang, M., & Kaur, M. (2024). Toward a theory of e-government: Challenges and opportunities: A literature review. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(10), 7707. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.7707
Zhang, Y., & Kimathi, F. A. (2022). Exploring the stages of e-government development from public value perspective. Technology in Society, 69, 101942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101942